Growth capital
Funding a defined expansion — a new line, a new geography, a larger order book — where the return is reasonably forecastable.
For businesses with the cash flows to service it, debt remains the least expensive way to fund growth — provided the structure matches the purpose and the case is prepared properly.
Debt funding covers any arrangement where a business borrows a defined amount and repays it with interest over an agreed period. The lender does not take a share of the business, does not participate in future profits and has no claim on strategic decisions beyond what the loan agreement specifies.
That is its central advantage. A promoter who funds a ₹15 crore expansion with debt still owns the same percentage of the business afterwards. One who funds it with equity does not.
The trade-off is obligation. Interest and principal fall due whether or not the expansion performs as expected, and lenders generally require security, covenants and often personal guarantees. Debt rewards predictability and punishes volatility.
“Debt is the right instrument when you are confident about cash flows and unwilling to share ownership. When either of those is uncertain, it is worth pausing.”
Structuring principleEach has a different natural tenor, security profile and lender appetite. Matching the instrument to the purpose is most of the work.
Funding a defined expansion — a new line, a new geography, a larger order book — where the return is reasonably forecastable.
Bridging the gap between paying suppliers and being paid by customers. Usually revolving rather than term, and sized to the cash conversion cycle.
Asset-backed facilities where the funded asset itself forms much of the security, typically over a longer tenor.
Larger, often multi-facility arrangements for established businesses with layered requirements across entities or divisions.
Arrangements shaped around specific cash flows, receivables or contracts rather than the general balance sheet.
Replacing existing facilities to improve tenor, pricing or covenant terms — often the most under-considered option on this list.
None of these is an absolute requirement. Together they describe the profile lenders find straightforward to underwrite.
The unglamorous middle of this list is where most declined applications are lost.
Establishing what is genuinely needed, over what period, and what the business can comfortably service. This number frequently changes.
Term versus revolving, tenor, security, guarantees and covenant tolerance — settled before anyone is approached.
Restating financials for an external reader, building defensible projections and reconciling statutory, tax and management accounts.
Identifying which lenders are actually active in your sector, ticket size and risk profile, then presenting the case in the form they assess.
Assembling the information pack and managing the requests that follow, so momentum is not lost to administration.
Preparing you for lender questions, comparing offers on a like-for-like basis and coordinating through to sanction.
Processing fees, insurance, prepayment penalties and the cost of maintaining security can move the effective cost materially.
A covenant you meet comfortably today may bind in a slower year. Model the downside before signing, not after.
Once assets are charged, refinancing options narrow. Understand what is being encumbered and what remains free.
Common in the Indian mid-market and frequently underestimated. Know exactly what is being guaranteed and for how long.
Short-tenor debt funding a long-payback asset creates refinancing risk. Matching them is basic, and often skipped.
Prepayment terms matter. Success should not be expensive.
Lenders generally look at serviceability rather than a single ratio — how comfortably existing and proposed obligations are covered by operating cash flow, alongside the security available and your conduct on existing facilities. Two businesses with identical turnover can have very different capacity.
A realistic range usually becomes clear once three years of financials and the current debt position have been reviewed.
In direct cost, almost always. Interest is a defined percentage, whereas equity gives away a share of all future value. But debt carries obligation regardless of performance, and equity does not. The correct comparison is not rate against dilution — it is certainty of obligation against certainty of return.
Frequently, yes. What matters is total serviceability, the security position, and whether existing lenders' terms permit additional borrowing. In some cases consolidating or refinancing existing facilities produces a better outcome than adding another one on top.
No, and any adviser who does should be treated with caution. We prepare and position the case as strongly as the underlying business supports. The credit decision belongs entirely to the lender.
Most funding conversations touch more than one route. These are the ones most often considered alongside this page.
Send us the requirement and the current debt position. We will tell you what looks fundable, what needs work first, and whether debt is even the right instrument.