Business assessment
An objective view of the operating position, because restructuring proposals stand or fall on whether the underlying business can support the revised schedule.
Debt taken on sound assumptions can become mismatched to a business that has changed. Restructuring is the work of realigning obligations with present reality.
Restructuring renegotiates the terms of existing debt so that it can be serviced sustainably. That might mean extending tenor, revising the repayment schedule, adjusting security, consolidating multiple facilities, or replacing existing debt with a differently structured arrangement.
What it does not mean is reducing what is owed. Lenders agree to restructuring where they conclude the restructured position is more likely to be repaid than the existing one. That is the entire logic of the exercise, and it explains what a credible proposal must demonstrate.
Businesses restructure for different reasons. Sometimes it is pressure. Often it is simply that debt raised for one phase no longer fits another — short-tenor facilities funding long-payback assets, or facilities accumulated across years that would be better consolidated.

An objective view of the operating position, because restructuring proposals stand or fall on whether the underlying business can support the revised schedule.
Mapping every facility: tenor, pricing, security, covenants, guarantees and inter-creditor position. This is frequently more complex than expected.
What the business can genuinely service, month by month, tested against a slower scenario rather than a hopeful one.
Engaging existing lenders with consistent information — particularly important where multiple lenders hold different security positions.
Building a revised schedule that is realistic for the business and defensible to a credit committee.
Assessing whether refinancing, consolidation or additional capital produces a better outcome than restructuring in place.
Timelines depend heavily on how many lenders are involved and how complete the information is at the outset.
A complete picture of facilities, security, guarantees and inter-creditor arrangements before anything is proposed.
Establishing what the business can sustainably service, tested against a downside rather than a plan.
Constructing a revised structure that works operationally and can be defended commercially to each lender.
Presenting the proposal with consistent information across all lenders, which matters greatly in multi-lender situations.
Working through lender requirements, which commonly include additional security, monitoring or promoter contribution.
Coordinating revised documentation and establishing the reporting discipline that follows.
Every element requires agreement. Lenders assess whether the restructured position genuinely improves their recovery prospects.
Additional security, promoter contribution, tighter monitoring or revised pricing are commonly required in exchange.
Restructuring can be reflected in credit reporting, with implications for future borrowing. Understand this before proceeding.
Different lenders hold different security and different views. Coordination becomes the central task.
A revised schedule the business cannot meet either fails quickly or damages the lender relationship permanently.
Restructuring carries legal consequences for the company, its directors and its guarantors. Qualified legal advice is essential alongside financial advisory.
Generally no. Restructuring changes the terms — tenor, schedule, security, sometimes pricing — rather than the principal. Arrangements involving a reduction in the amount owed sit in a different and more formal category, typically requiring specialist insolvency and legal advice.
They agree when the restructured position appears more likely to be repaid than the existing one, and when the proposal is credible and well-evidenced. They decline when neither is true. Preparation materially affects which of those applies, but no adviser can commit a lender to anything.
Not necessarily. Plenty of restructuring is proactive — consolidating facilities, extending tenor to match asset life, or refinancing at better pricing. It becomes distress-driven only when it is left until the position is already strained.
Refinancing replaces existing debt with new debt, often from a different lender, and is generally preferable where the business is strong enough to attract it. Restructuring renegotiates in place and is the route where refinancing is not realistically available. We assess both before recommending either.
Most funding conversations touch more than one route. These are the ones most often considered alongside this page.
Share the current facility position and recent financials. We will tell you whether restructuring, refinancing or something else is the more realistic route.